Summary: This article explains how attackers copy an Arduino’s flashed .hex (firmware) and reverse-engineer it, then describes practical hardware and firmware techniques to make copying and reversing harder — from AVR lock bits and fuse settings to secure elements and physical countermeasures. It also honestly covers the limits: no method is perfect against a motivated, well-equipped attacker.
1 — What “hex copying” and “reverse-engineering” mean here
Hex copying: reading the MCU’s program memory (flash) and saving the raw binary or Intel HEX file. Tools such as ISP programmers (e.g., AVRISP, USBasp) plus utilities (avrdude) can often read flash if the device permits it.
Reverse-engineering: taking that binary and disassembling/decompiling it to understand code, algorithms, or extract secrets. Tools include objdump, avr-objdump, IDA, Ghidra, etc.
Attackers use low-cost hardware + open tools or physically extract memory (chip-off) to retrieve firmware.
2 — How attackers commonly get the .hex
Using the programming/debug port
ISP, ICSP, SWD, JTAG, UPDI, SWIM, etc. If the MCU’s read protection is not enabled, an attacker with a programmer can read flash.
Bootloader or UART-based download channels
If a bootloader supports reading flash or relaying memory, it can be abused.
Service interfaces and interfaces left enabled (serial, I2C bridges, etc.)
On-board memory chips (external SPI or QSPI flash) that are not protected.
Physical attacks — decapping, microprobing, or reading flash directly after desoldering the chip. These are expensive but possible.
3 — Basic software/hardware protections (what you can do on an Arduino-class MCU)
These are the first and most practical lines of defense.
3.1 Lock bits / Read-protection fuses
Many AVR microcontrollers (e.g., ATmega series) have lock bits that prevent reading flash or restrict what can be read over ISP. Other families (STM32, SAMD, etc.) have similar read protection options (option bytes, security bits).
How they help: once set, the programmer will be refused when trying to read flash over the normal programming interface.
Important: lock bits are usually one-way without a full chip erase. Setting them typically forces a chip erase to unlock the device — which destroys the firmware. This is useful to prevent duplication but also means you must keep a master copy of firmware safe.
Caveat: exact lock/fuse names and semantics differ by MCU family. Always consult the MCU datasheet before setting fuses/lock bits.
3.2 Disable or secure debug interfaces
Disable JTAG/SWD/UPDI/ICSP when shipping a product if not needed.
Or protect them via option bytes that require hardware steps to enable.
Remove or cut traces to debug headers on production units (or place solder-jumpers) to stop casual access.
3.3 Disable bootloader readback / enforce signature checks
Do not include code that echoes or dumps flash contents.
Use a bootloader that refuses read operations or requires authentication.
Use a bootloader that verifies a digital signature on new firmware images (prevents unauthorized reprogramming).
3.4 Use external secure elements
Offload sensitive keys or crypto operations to dedicated secure chips (e.g., Microchip ATECC608A). The MCU never stores private keys in plain flash.
Sign firmware images with a private key stored in the secure element; MCU verifies signature using a public key burned into read-only area or secure storage.
3.5 Encrypt or sign firmware images
Implement a secure bootloader that verifies a signature (public key) before jumping to application firmware. Without the private signing key an attacker cannot produce a runnable image.
Full flash encryption is supported on some MCUs (e.g., some Cortex-M parts with flash encryption). AVR classic parts generally do not support on-chip encryption.
4 — Hardware hardening options (practical measures)
These reduce the risk of casual copying and raise the bar for attackers.
4.1 Remove or hide programming headers
Put ISP pads under the PCB, use vias, or place pads on an internal layer — rather than exposing a 6-pin header.
Use one-time soldered headers or solder-mask-defined pads.
4.2 Solder masks, tamper meshes, epoxy and potting
Conformal coating or potting makes physical access and decapping harder.
Tamper meshes (conductive traces over the die/board) can detect tampering (if cut, the device erases secret or refuses to boot).
4.3 PCB design: isolate critical buses
Place external flash or crypto chips on inner PCB layers or glue them down.
Avoid exposing SPI lines through connectors.
4.4 Use MCU variants with built-in security
Choose chips with hardware security (secure boot, on-chip AES engine, flash encryption, secure element integration) for higher protection.
Examples: some Cortex-M chips, or microcontrollers with TrustZone-like features or secure boot ROMs.
5 — Advanced protections & countermeasures
These are for higher security needs; they are more complex and costly.
5.1 Chain of trust / Secure boot
Boot ROM → Bootloader (verifies signature) → Application.
Each stage verifies the next by checking cryptographic signatures, preventing modified or cloned images from running.
5.2 Encrypted external storage
If firmware or keys must be on external flash, use on-the-fly encryption with a key only known to the MCU (or stored in a secure element).
5.3 Secure elements & HSMs
Keep private keys and sensitive ops inside tamper-resistant secure elements. MCU asks secure element to sign/verify without ever seeing private key.
5.4 Anti-fault & side-channel protections
Implement clock/voltage anomaly detection that halts or erases secrets on tampering attempts (glitching attacks).
Add noise, constant-time cryptography to mitigate side-channel leakage (power analysis).
6 — Realistic limitations — be honest about what’s achievable
No perfect protection. A highly motivated attacker with lab equipment can extract firmware via chip-off, decapping, or microprobing.
Goal is risk reduction. The objective for most products is to prevent casual copying and raise the cost/time/effort needed to copy.
Tradeoffs: stronger security adds BOM cost, complexity, and sometimes more complex provisioning (key management).
7 — Practical step checklist you can apply today
Decide your threat model. Who are you defending against — casual hobbyists, competitors, or nation-state actors?
Backup master firmware. Always keep an offline signed copy of your release firmware and keys.
Set lock bits/read protection using a trusted programmer (after testing). Remember this may require chip-erase to reprogram/unlock.
Disable hardware debug in production (fuses/option bytes or physically remove header).
Use a signed bootloader to prevent cloned firmware execution.
Move secrets off MCU to a secure element (ATECC or equivalent) for signature/key storage.
Obfuscate PCB: hide or remove programming connectors, or require special fixtures to access them.
Add tamper detection if the application justifies it.
8 — Example (conceptual) commands & notes
I won’t provide raw fuse bytes here because fuse/lock formats differ per MCU and setting wrong values can brick a device. But the typical workflow is:
Use your programmer and the MCU datasheet to determine the correct lock/fuse settings.
Example (conceptual) with avrdude (replace MCU and values after checking datasheet):
avrdude -c <prog> -p <mcu> -U lock:w:<lockvalue>:m
avrdude -c <prog> -p <mcu> -U lfuse:w:<lfusevalue>:m -U hfuse:w:<hfusevalue>:m
Important: Always verify lock/fuse semantics in the MCU datasheet and practice on a sacrificial board first.
9 — Ethical & legal note
Use these protections responsibly. Some anti-tamper measures (e.g., permanent fusing, disabling debug) can make debugging or repair very difficult.
Respect laws and security disclosure rules — do not use these techniques to hide illegal modifications.
10 — Conclusion
For Arduino-class devices, lock bits + disable debug + signed bootloader + secure elements are the most practical combination to prevent casual copying and reverse-engineering.
For high-value IP or safety-critical devices, consider moving to MCUs with built-in secure-boot/flash encryption and use a hardware secure module for keys.
No comments:
Post a Comment